A Finance Professor's blog. I am a Professor of Finance in the Poole College of Management at NC State University. My website: https://sites.google.com/ncsu.edu/warr Opinions are my own.
Monday, September 24, 2012
Facebook's beta
This link popped up in my RSS reader today - from two different sources - finance II at tepper and newmark's door.
The basic finding:
The return correlation between Facebook and Zinga is greater that the correlation between Facebook and the S&P 500 and the trading volume correlation between FB and the S&P 500 is greater than the volume correlation between FB and Zinga.
I thought I'd run the numbers - here's what I got:
Obviously these are two stocks that have very low market risk - less that 1% of their returns is explained by the S&P 500. ZNGA has a negative beta, and the confidence interval for both betas is huge.
In other words, these are two stocks whose risk is virtually all idiosyncratic. It is probably a mistake to put any weight on these beta estimates.
The basic finding:
The return correlation between Facebook and Zinga is greater that the correlation between Facebook and the S&P 500 and the trading volume correlation between FB and the S&P 500 is greater than the volume correlation between FB and Zinga.
I thought I'd run the numbers - here's what I got:
FB | SP500 | ZNGA | |
covar(i,m) | 0.00001535 | 0.00007962 | (0.00002087) |
correl(i,m) | 0.04 | 1.00 | (0.04) |
var(i) | 0.001625 | 0.000080 | 0.003155 |
ann SD (i) |
13.962%
|
3.091%
|
19.457%
|
beta (i) | 0.1928 | 1.0000 | (0.2622) |
Correl of volume | 0.2592 | 1.0000 | 0.3256 |
R-sqr from CPM |
0.18%
|
0.17%
|
Obviously these are two stocks that have very low market risk - less that 1% of their returns is explained by the S&P 500. ZNGA has a negative beta, and the confidence interval for both betas is huge.
In other words, these are two stocks whose risk is virtually all idiosyncratic. It is probably a mistake to put any weight on these beta estimates.
Friday, September 7, 2012
Bursting the bubble of investment management riches
An interesting article on the relevance of active management.
Interesting because it is largely correct in that active management has been shown time and time again to be a loosing endeavor compared to indexing, and interesting because it heavily quotes Ron Elmer, a good friend on mine.
Interesting because it is largely correct in that active management has been shown time and time again to be a loosing endeavor compared to indexing, and interesting because it heavily quotes Ron Elmer, a good friend on mine.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
What's going on with inflation?
I recently posted an article on the Poole College Thought Leadership page titled: " What's going on with inflation?" . This w...
-
I recently posted an article on the Poole College Thought Leadership page titled: " What's going on with inflation?" . This w...
-
Another inflation illusion post. This time with math. Again the issue here is that you can't just increase the discount rate when you a...
-
Sometimes I come across an academic research paper that is just so interesting I feel compelled to share it with my MBA students. This is o...