Credit ratings agencies are a protection racket. Issuers have to get a rating and at the same time, they have to pay the rating agency for it. If they don't pay then their rating will suffer, and this will cost the issuer.
Now the ratings agencies are worried about potential liability if they are wrong about their ratings. So they have added clauses to their ratings contracts requiring that the debt issuer indemnify them if they are sued. The self evident blog presents a couple of examples of this.
It would be one thing if the issuers had a choice about whether or not they could get a rating, but they don't. They have to participate in the protection racket. But now the local thugs are wanting the victims to pay their court costs as well.
There is a better way. One in which ratings are paid for by the bond buyer and where ratings firms don't have monopolies and are liable for their mistakes. Essentially a free market for ratings.
A Finance Professor's blog. I am a Professor of Finance in the Poole College of Management at NC State University. My website: https://sites.google.com/ncsu.edu/warr Opinions are my own.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
What's going on with inflation?
I recently posted an article on the Poole College Thought Leadership page titled: " What's going on with inflation?" . This w...
-
A recent paper by some computer science folks at Indiana finds that the mood on twitter can predict movements in the Dow Jones Industrial A...
-
I recently posted an article on the Poole College Thought Leadership page titled: " What's going on with inflation?" . This w...
-
Another inflation illusion post. This time with math. Again the issue here is that you can't just increase the discount rate when you a...
No comments:
Post a Comment